Insan BLOG

it was too bad that i drowned very deep in my own lake of disappointment.
two weeks ago, my research supervisor (RS) told me something shocking: i better drive my research to another way.
i did not cry a lot after that, since i knew that his idea was the best choice to take.

but i took some time to get it all. i ran: leaving research methodology book that i must read since my
RS is the writer and putting aside Pinter’s, Cameron’s, and Paul’s book.
then i went out to Jakarta for family business. then i got flu. then i still escaped from the reality.

the laziness gave in last week. i tried to come with a new topic research: thematic instruction.
brand new idea. innovation. something that my RS and I (finally) expected.
i went to the school in which implemented the system. they refused. they’ll be busy this term, so
they cannot welcome collegians to do research.
thank u, i said, resentfully (i spoke to myself, of course).
how pathetic to see fear of an arrogant institution whose system potentially being adopted.
yeah. up tu yu, i said slowly to them.
i hate this since they did not even invite me to discuss about my research.
furthermore, i felt there was no correlation between the reason for refusing me and my research plan.
gotcha! arrogance never generates genuine success- just see.

i strolled slowly- glancing at one etalase to another, as if in a mall- to seek for any kind of new topic for my research.
then i got happy since i found these two words: hortatory exposition and critical thinking.
subject of the research: my own students at my PLP place.

wish i cud be more lucky this time by finding right issue ^_^

nb: i started to read the research methodology again, yippie….